Woad Raiders horn.

I am trying to weigh crit versus damage on the horn (25%crit vs 37% damage ish on mine).
Clearly the damage horn would give a higher average damage, but the woad raiders strategy seems to favor charge, burst and die rather than living long enough to average out the damage (Does charges even crit?).
Is it worth to sacrifice 12-13% average damage to focus on the strategy (like some archers sacrifice damage for range even if not quantified on the item in this case)?

When I play, I prefer crit and feel it to be more effective, but I might be biased.

What is the concensus on this if there's one?

 

Yeah, Im pondering this with lvl 40 30% crit/life advisor active and it increases my bias toward focusing on crit!
I ran a couple games alternating crit and damage and I felt that the explosiveness nature of crit made more woads survive to strike another time because they oneshot them before they oneshot us.
While hitting walls and castle, it was hard to tell the difference, but it was probably better with higher average damage.

 

Nice, how high the hp go?
It sounds to go in an opposite direction of the strategy of a stream of expendable units tho, but i bet it works anyway!

 

So, Is this some kind of placebo effect?
If I think my build is good, I will have higher morale and play better thus making my build seem better than it really is.
I will consider this when testing further!