Babylonian legendary advisors overlap

All of these just sounds like you want a buff to lancer, which is already a strong unit. An alternative to remove the overlap is by making King Nebuchadnezzar only buff lancer, but not changing its stats.

 

Don t forget the Mounted Archers!!
I think lancers are already strong as they are and even without Nebuchadnezzar they are good. But I agree with a change since Sargon is much better.

 

I personally don't have any issues, I basically use nebu only for lancers anyways.

The fact that is buffs all cavalry units is just a needless bonus Imo. I think they do their job fine and I feel the reason why they may seem a bit underwhelming now is because the Norse horsemen is advisor is kind of ridiculous.

If lancers got similar buffs they would be insane. I'd prefer for things not to get power creeped so I'm ok with how it is right now.

Another thing of note is that compared to Norse and celts, Babylon has access to palintonons which can offset the lack of building damage bonuses on the lancers when compared to the horsemen of those respective civs. Log throwers and stone throwers don't really hold a candle to palins.

 

That's kinda the point of Babylonian (and Egyptian) styles, and Babylonian get an age 2 health regen tech for all military units. I'd be inclined to agree with Geese, that other civ cavalry options have had a big(ger) buff with the advisor card reworks, but we should be careful to not just be powercreeping through future changes to advisor cards (I'd rather gearing/progression tiers in newer legendary and elite quests over any other form of power creep). Economies across the board have way more flexibility with the recent reworks (some of the old cards were just a waste of space), and I think it's too early still for the "best builds for each civ" to have truly been perfected yet.