Search results

BEFORE this Hip buff, with both at champ, ignoring armory techs, Cata have: Worse: 50% more pop than Hip ~40% more cost than Hip Same: Same DPS (except vs inf/siege, which is 150% more) as Hip Same Speed, LOS, Train time, etc. Rigorous training gives a slight train time advantage over Agog...

I mostly bring them up because they seem rarely used (ignoring games that don't make it to age 4, even). Persian comps in age 4 seem to devolve into just Asa + MAs, so maybe it's a bigger issue than cataphract balancing.

Is Cataphract going to get similar love to Hippos?

+1. This feature is awesome, Kevsoft. I get that there's a lot of other stuff on your list, but when you get to this one, super jazzed about being able to rely on the #s, and Faluzure's suggestion of making them more visible.

Having a separate tech for herdables would only make sense if they were a major component on most maps, otherwise there's little incentive to invest in something that only impacts herdables. Celts are a notable exception because they can train herdables; hence they also have a herdables-only...

I remember reading somewhere that losing units/buildings would cause you to lose points (or earn less points?). Has anyone verified that?

Now that we can chose colors I don't think there's anything other Age games have that we don't have :P

Bumping this. Would be a huge QoL change to inventory management. Even if there was just a built in sort (like what we have for Marketplace).

Thanks PF2K! Another few gear items that have a similar (but reverse) issue: Ordinary Training Scroll (lvl 14, craftable) Vanguard Training Scroll (lvl 5, Windy's) Weathered Training Scroll (lvl 4, craftable) Training Scroll of Amnisos (lvl 2) Effect on all of these is "Train/Research...

This may not qualify as a bug, but Contrebis' Master-Forging Design has a training manual icon instead of a blueprint icon. Could we switch it to the same icon as or similar icon to Adept Construction Blueprints? Edit: I guess the same goes for the recipe icon as well.

Yessss! These types of quests remind me a lot of how AoE:II quests worked. Replaying historical events, following an historical character as they garner support...awesome stuff; I'm excited.

@MainMan B there's a function to move buildings, so you wouldn't need to pack them & respend resources on building them again. Still, doesn't help with trying to change the map.

Doing God's work, Arde. Keep it up!

Seeing a vague title like "The Future of the Romans" really had me fearing for the worst. This turned out to be the complete opposite. Wow! So impressed, Celeste team!

Oh man I didn't even think about the undroppable stuff. I remember lenses and a few other things that had levels reduced in early days...that was my first fortune, was selling a high-level lense. Ofc the buyer resold :P

Wouldn't adding a few 0s to gold rewards for PvE actually shake things up a bit more, in a very non-toxic way? It dilutes the wealth of the extremely rich.

In-game name: CrimsonCantab Suggested change: Factory buildings are 50% Cheaper and build 50% faster Reason for this change: Ignoring Philon, we have advisors that affect the build time of houses, wonders, fortresses, TCs, walls, & storehouses, but no factory buildings (rax, range, stables...

The biggest issue with priests in PvE is that converted units lose their gear. On high level quests, that's basically equivalent to AI researching AoE:II Heresy.

I could foresee a few issues with the quest skipping; not major ones but points of concern. My immediate thought is that there are some global, non-repeatable quests that are something different than "complete these quests", which would be impossible to complete if some quests are skipped. The...

I personally don't like comparative statements like this. Project Celeste would not have been possible without the original dev team (of which there were actually 2 dev teams). But I digress. It certainly must be said that the Celeste team continues to blow my socks off. Well done, these are...